.
Feedback

Protesters Organize Chick-fil-A Same Sex Kiss Day for Friday

Mike Huckabee has called Wednesday, Aug. 1 "Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day" and Protesters have have responded with "Chick-fil-A Same Sex Kiss Day" on Friday, Aug. 3.

In response to Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy’s statement against same-sex marriage and reaffirming the company’s stance on the traditional family unit, Mike Huckabee on his Facebook page has called for Wednesday, August 1 for be “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day.”

According to Huffington Post, Huckabee, on his Facebook page said, “The goal is simple: Let's affirm a business that operates on Christian principles and whose executives are willing to take a stand for the Godly values we espouse by simply showing up and eating at Chick-fil-A on Wednesday, August 1.”

On Monday, LGBT Weekly reported that Philadelphia City Councilman James Kenney sent a letter to the company’s president telling him that Chick-fil-A is not welcome in the City of Brotherly Love.

Kenney also vowed in the letter to introduce a resolution at the next City Council meeting that will condemn the company.

Protesters of Chick-fil-A’s stance on same-sex marriage have organized National Same Sex Kiss Day at Chick-fil-A restaurants on Friday, August 3.

According to Eater.com, the protesters want you to show up to your local Chick-fil-A and make out with someone of the same sex, take photos, and post them to the Chick-fil-A Facebook page.

Dot August 2, 2012 at 05:00 pm
Part II: I sent an email to them this morning: I sent an email to them this morning: "Hello. I was at the Chick-Fil-A in Warrington yesterday from about 6:30 to 7:30 PM. I viewed the video of the coverage by Omari Fleming. It was biased and incomplete in regard to the purpose of the event, as well as the portrayal of the folks who were waiting to get into the establishment.
The Fox 29 truck was parked across the entry driveway from the CFA building. The report starts with the statement that people were there to support the owner's stance against same-sex marriage. I can not say how Mr. Fleming came to that conclusion, as he did not speak to anyone who was in the crowd at the building. The video shows Mr. Fleming speaking to a man who expressed his views on same-sex marriage. That must have been before I arrived as I did not see that encounter. I noticed that it was a gentleman who was not in the crowd at the building, but somewhere on the periphery. It was not until the 2 young ladies who were there to protest CFA arrived, that I saw Mr. Fleming and the cameraman got out of the truck. They immediately approached them. On the video, Mr. Fleming stated there were confrontations with the protesters, which was not true. Yes, there was another gentleman in the video who spoke directly to the young ladies. That gentleman however was not with the crowd.
Dot August 2, 2012 at 05:01 pm
Part III: "I question the sincerity and veracity of the reporting. Mr. Fleming did not come to the building at all to speak to anyone. No one from the crowd confronted the protesters. The conversation among the group centered on the right of free speech.
There was no mention of any opinions regarding same-sex marriage, only that the CEO had every right to say what he said. If the various Mayors of Boston, Chicago and San Francisco and the Councilman from Philly had not threatened the CEO and his livelihood, there would have been no event at all. I watch Fox 29 on occasion, but with this type of biased, inaccurate, incomplete "reporting", I will minimize my viewing and encourage others to do the same".
Jessica August 2, 2012 at 05:21 pm
Mike, There are countless legal protections that marriage affords to individuals. As just one example, marriage status affects custody decisions after divorce or the death of a parent. There are countless examples of people who found themselves with no rights to the children that they had raised after the death of their same sex partner. It affects things like social security or pension benefits after the death of a partner. Also, what about the little stuff like tax filing status? If there is no right to marriage then why are heterosexual couples (even atheist heterosexuals) able to marry and enjoy the legal protections of marriage? These things are law, not religion, based. Making it legal for someone to have a firearm or buy marijuana doesn't prevent one specific group of people from having equal protection under the law. I am looking at this purely from the standpoint of wanting everyone to be able to have the same legal protections. I am neither homosexual nor extremely religious. Same sex marriage being illegal for everyone based on religious reasons is a direct violation of the separation of church and state.
Mike Shortall August 2, 2012 at 05:24 pm
Jessica: I've never stated anywhere that I object to the civil inclusion of gays in marriage. What I did say is that I know of no civil "right" to marriage.
Michael J. August 2, 2012 at 05:57 pm
To me free speech is the only thing that matters in this whole mess. The ACLU is defending the KKK's right to free speech in an "adopt a highway" campaign. How should this be handled.
Janis C Sheridan August 2, 2012 at 06:13 pm
I'm sorry Dot. Your message escaped me. I did watch your link to Fox and could not really determine WHAT exactly you expected to see. We all knew the opinions and reasons those supporting CFA were there. Did it trouble you that Fox sought out the opinions of those disagreeing? Actually, that is what the news media is suppose to do.
Janis C Sheridan August 2, 2012 at 06:23 pm
WOW....Dot. I stand by my previous comment. I am here with a friend whose political bent is much more liberal than mine. He also listened to the Fox news link and wonders if you were smoking something when you were watching it.
Dot August 2, 2012 at 08:44 pm
Janice, Thanks for telling me that you and your friend are liberals, but from your dismissive remarks, that was easy guess. From your comments, I assume that you did not read the entire series of 3 comments. The slant of the reporter was that this event was an anti-gay event, when in fact it was a show of support for an individual exercising ones 1st Amendment right. There was no commentary elicited from the participants, to set the record straight. Liberals usually deny that conservative issues and actions are skewed, dismissed and disparaged by the media. You deny that folks who are interviewed are selected for their ability to support the media's preconceived ideas. Editing is done in a way to further debase the issues and folks involved. I assume this is your mindset.
Larry Legend's biggest fan! August 2, 2012 at 09:46 pm
Golden, I always thought you were goofy. You might be, but I agree w/ you and your thoughts. Cathy is retarded for what he said. If he was into Howard Stern the people standing behind him would be calling for his head! Everyone is a fraud. incl. me & the Cockroach!
Janis C Sheridan August 2, 2012 at 09:54 pm
Ahhh Dot,
Thank you for your comment. I do now understand where you were coming from when you said you would not watch Fox News again and advise your friends. You, also, misunderstood me. I am very much a conservative. I have almost no liberal bent except that I do believe in peoples individual rights. But, my group of friends is very eclectic. I do believe that gays should have their own union with the ability to have couples' privileges...I just do not want them to change the traditional definition of marriage. That being said, I do watch FOX, MSNBC and CBS. It is my opinion that after watching MSNBC and CBS, I have been made very aware of the liberal point of view. I then turn on FOX and hear both sides of the same story. In the Fox clip you sited, my reaction was only that we all knew (we conservatives) knew why the mass was there. There didn't seem to be a need to interview participants (although later on the news it is obvious that they did). Having interviewed the lesbian couple was, in my opinion, in keeping with Fox's efforts to be fair and balanced.
Dot August 3, 2012 at 04:09 am
Hi, Janice. I see your confusion. For clarification, though, the video was from Fox 29, the local station and its news, not the FNC cable channel. I believe they needed to lay out the full parameters of the story. Yes, this story on FNC, would have needed less explanation of what the gist of the story was, and it would be important to show the other side. I watch the Fox News Channel, and it did a good job of coverage and discussion.
Just tonight, Bill O"Reilly had a good "Talking Points" segment that laid out the argument well. It's at this site: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/index.html#/v/1768571963001/a-big-victory-for-traditional-forces/?playlist_id=86923 I watch MSNBC and CNN also to get a feel for what is being said. Also, I subscribe to various web sites and facebook pages to keep an eye on happenings. Very interesting! My whole thing is we have a 1st Amendment right to free speech, and no private citizen should be threatened with loss of any kind due to stated beliefs.
Janis C Sheridan August 3, 2012 at 11:17 am
I am in TOTAL agreement with you! It amazes me that this is even happening. In fact, If I can work my schedule, I am going to have lunch at CFA today....even if I didn't enjoy the food! However, truth be told, I believe they are one of the best fast food chains out there. We are so close to a fascist govt that is is frightening. I could say more, but I won't :-(
Dot August 3, 2012 at 02:20 pm
It will be interesting to see how the protest goes today.I'll ignore this,as it is an attempt by gay activists to get folks to react in a negative way.I don't care what they do,but stand for Dan Cathy's right to say and do what he will.If no one bothers them,I believe there will be problems that are caused by activist groups.From what I observed in Warrington,I believe that at the least the guy who confronted the young ladies was a "plant".There were 2 young guys who had been standing at the corner of the property for a time talking on phones.When the protesters arrived, they went down to that area.After the gentleman confronted them,he and the 2 guys went across the driveway and hung out.Very suspicious!I've seen this on several occasions at events in DC.The "opposition" (whoever they may be) stages an argument between a person pretending to be with the group and someone opposing their views. During the encounter, there is someone recording the whole thing. Eventually, the confrontation turns into a display by the "plant/imposter/infiltrator" that makes the group appear like idiots.This in turn gets put on youtube to try to perpetuate some kind of negative stereotype.Once there was such an encounter and I started folks chanting,"If you're not an infiltrator, step away". Interestingly, the only ones left were the 2 guys hollering and the recording guy. With that, they all left. The tactics of the left are very interesting, maddening, predictable and pretty hateful at times.
Issue Driven August 3, 2012 at 02:50 pm
Hate Speech proponents try to stifle debate and rewrite history through omission.
<http://www.armenianweekly.com/2012/01/23/breaking-news-french-senate-passes-bill-criminalizing-armenian-genocide-denial/>. If you _deny_ the Armenian Genocide occurred you can be convicted of "hate speech; BUT; if you say that the Turkish _committed_ that Genocide; that is "hate speech" as it insults "Turkishness". So, you just don't say anything as not to offend. Put another way... it would be akin to stating that the Holocaust didn't occur; that is "Hate Speech" , but if you say that the Germans at the time committed the atrocities; that is "Hate Speech". So how do you discuss a topic?
Issue Driven August 3, 2012 at 03:06 pm
I would hasten to add that the Mayors involvement here makes me wonder... What ever happened to the Left's love of the Separation of Church and State? Now because THEY disagree with a religious tenet held by a private citizen OR a private business they feel that they can impose THEIR (The States) value and belief on them by BULLYING. In this case the "State" includes - The Chicago Values? The Boston Values and the San Fransisco Values? The juice flows both ways in this conduit, doesn't it? Also find it curious that Rahm Emmanual- the mayor of Chicago was the White House Chief of Staff until a year ago or so; But President Obama didn't "evolve" his position on this matter until 3 months ago. Would President Obama have been welcome in Chicago because his public opinion was basically the same as Dan Cathy's? Or is it that we now have to believe what the President believes?
Janis C Sheridan August 3, 2012 at 03:22 pm
Dot and Issue Driven, you are both correct. Earlier this morning, I found myself thinking about Hitler....same goal, different tactics. Kill off individual freedoms that do not coincide with yours. It is amazing that the left can't see themselves as they really are. It is not that they believe in what they are saying, but it is the anger and hateful ways in which they display their opposition. Issue Driven, do you honestly believe that Obama's earlier position was real???? He only espouses what the voters with whom he is talking wish to hear. It's all about being reelected. It is becoming more and more obvious that he wants to strip the entire nation of their individual rights so as to return us to the original state from which we fought for independence.
Stephanie Loeb August 3, 2012 at 03:34 pm
This is ridiculous...what's next, Philly kicks out the Catholic Church?
Dot August 3, 2012 at 03:44 pm
Silencing dissent is dangerous for us all. There are factions that do not understand that. Immediate gratification of ideological feelings is the goal. There is no recognition of the consequences down the road. Just look at some of the provisions of the laws enacted in the past 3.5 years. Get it done! Rush it through! Unintended consequences have and will continue to rear their ugly heads again and again. There is a puppeteer pulling the strings. Go this way...go that... Who is it?
Dot August 3, 2012 at 03:49 pm
I really think this needs to be about freedom of speech, not same-sex marriage. However, did you see the video of the Coalition of African-American Pastors' statement? See here: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/31/black-pastors-group-launches-anti-obama-campaign-around-gay-marriage/
Janis C Sheridan August 3, 2012 at 03:52 pm
Believe me, Stephanie, it would make them quite happy if it were that easy. But you see already how they are forcing the Catholic institutions to go against what their beliefs are. I was born and raised a Roman Catholic. I am not one who wears religion on my shirtsleeve, but I am resenting so much what Christians have been having to put up with. Art in a public institution depicting the Blessed Mother with urine and feces all over it is just one example. But honestly, burn the Koran and the President along with his liberal cronies have to step in. Nancy Pelosi, she is the worst...., "...I was born and raised a Catholic and to my knowledge, the pope has never taken a stand on abortion..." If I hadn't heard it with my own ears, I would never have believed it. But this isn't a religious thing, I was just trying to show what lying, double standard and hypocritical people we have "serving" "we the people.".
Janis C Sheridan August 3, 2012 at 06:24 pm
Hi Libby,
Our upbringings seem similar. Two brothers in our family have long time relationships. There was never a question of not respecting them. They deserve all the rights and privileges as a married couple. I do, however, resent the insistence on changing the traditional term of marriage. If their rights are their real concern, then that should be the fight.. Tolerance and common sense no longer exist in negotiating. What heterosexual couples you know could you imagine forcing exhibitions in front of anyplace.to make a point. When breast feeding (which is so natural, and yet people thought it disgusting) in public was taboo. We just got our babies, covered our breasts and fed nursed. It was done tastefully and did not embarrass anyone. And the few who had to go overboard were quickly forgotten. They did not make the difference. Go to Chicago and watch the Gay Pride Parade. If you can deal with it for more than a few minutes, you might get a laugh. But I assure you that if heterosexuals did the same thing, we most certainly would be fined and posted all over the news. This is really not a religious issue. Quoting the bible is only effective if one interpretation coincides with one's own belief. This is about freedom. We are in very grave danger and I am happy to see so many people agreeing that gays have their rights, but not at the expense of others' rights. The more who believe, this president will not be reelected.
Truth August 3, 2012 at 07:02 pm
What ever happened to separation of church and state? While I agree that gay marriage should be allowed as a legal construct... a religious one is another story, that should be up to the church and have nothing to do with law. But It is well within Mr Cathy's rights to hold to his religious convictions. I am willing to bet that most of you who are rallying and boycotting chick-fil-a because of his religious beliefs have at one time or another patronized a church (private Catholic/Christian education, church collection plate, church bazaar, carnival etc) which is quite a large institution in favor of similar traditional beliefs (marriage between a man and a woman) and who would be quick to echo the sentiments of Mr Cathy. Hypocrites? It is no surprise that Chick-fil-a is run by a religious family, they have never been open on Sundays, it is pretty much public knowledge. Why is everyone so shocked that Mr Cathy is in opposition to gay marriage? I wonder how many of you outraged protesters of chic-fil-a have kids that go to catholic school, or do you only believe in this cause when its not a real sacrifice and you can feel like you "did something". If you don't like it, don't eat there. This is ridiculous.
Issue Driven August 3, 2012 at 08:16 pm
By The Way.... DOMA (The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (Pub.L. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419, enacted September 21, 1996, 1 U.S.C. § 7 and 28 U.S.C. § 1738C) is a United States federal law that defines marriage as the legal union of one man and one woman. The law passed both houses of Congress by large majorities and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 21, 1996.) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Marriage_Act> It was supported until President Obama unilaterally _decided_ it was unconstitutional and had his justice department stop enforcing it. <http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/260494/breaking-obama-administration-declares-doma-unconstitutional-wont-defend-it-court-dani> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BUT if you want to hear a nice reasoned debate on the central issue please follow this link to a Dennis Prager debating Perez HIlton on Larry King. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTE9zWaQc_Y>
Tom Bartman August 3, 2012 at 10:05 pm
Thank you liberals and progressives for making Chick Fil A a great success on Wednesday. The record sales could not have happened with you all! Because of your sick and twisted views, Chick Fil A will continue to thrive. Thanks again!
Janis C Sheridan August 4, 2012 at 12:10 am
Ahhhh....very well put, Tom.
Katrina August 4, 2012 at 12:12 am
I think Chik fil -a did a good job standing up for what s right. "Be ye therfore doers of the Word and not hearer's only"
Janis C Sheridan August 4, 2012 at 12:18 am
Dear Collegeville Mom...you are insisting on saying this is about the belief or non belief in gay marriage. It is about the freedom to believe it or not to believe it. I do and have always had gay friends and would be disappointed if they did not see the difference. And yes, they do know how I feel. We can agree to disagree simply because I don't believe in it, does not mean I do not respect them. We just have a difference of opinion. If you had a health store business and I knew you were gay, would I have the right to call all my heterosexual friends and force your store to close. I would have the right, but it would not have crossed my mind for a nanosecond to do so. Still don't get it???
Katrina August 4, 2012 at 12:23 am
Jesus said we as christians are to be the salt of the earth and not go where ever the crowd takes us. Be a God pleaser and not a man pleaser
Janis C Sheridan August 4, 2012 at 12:31 am
LOL...I wish I said that, Jeanne.
Janis C Sheridan August 4, 2012 at 01:02 am
The fact that CFA has never been open on Sunday because the "family owned business" believes people should be free to worship if they choose, has never been a secret. Mr. Cathy does not discriminate in hiring nor serving anyone on any basis. I took my mother to Olive Garden quite a few years ago and there were two waiters setting the same table, rubbing butts and practically falling all over each other. Mom leaned over and said, "They must be gay." I just laughed and said, "You think?" It never entered my mind to complain to anyone, or to not return to Olive Garden. My only thought was that the over zealous PDA in front of customers is distasteful for ANY couple. I have a feeling that CFA's investors will be fine.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lower Gwynedd-Ambler-Whitpain Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Michael G. Comfort June 16, 2013 at 12:10 am
Congratulations to all of you, your parents and leaders on a job well done. Mike Comfort Ceremonies'Read More Advisor Unami Lodge #1, Order of the Arrow